I believe there are some big pluses to including game-like learning within the classroom setting. Where I
may differ from Prensky, however, is that I don’t believe in the idea of using it as the sole means of instruction delivered to students of the
net-generation (digital natives). As teachers, we all know that every year the
makeup of our classes is different. To group all kids into the same category of
learner based simply upon when they are born does a disservice to those kids
that do not learn kinesthetically. A well-rounded education is made up of more
than one mode of learning and I believe it my job as a teacher to ensure that
students are just that – well-rounded. To prepare them to be college and career
ready definitely includes a technological component. However, there are many
more skills they need to learn as well to be ready for the future workforce.
One of the main things that would be lacking from a learning
environment focused solely on the gaming aspect is the social collaboration
piece that is crucial to success in the real world. Whether students go to
college or not, you would be hard pressed to find a job that does not require
some sort of collaboration. Working in face-to-face interactions with their
peers, students learn how to be a leader and also how to sometimes take a step
back and be the follower.
As technology becomes more readily available, especially
through 1:1 initiatives that put technology into the hands of each student, it
is imperative that teachers understand the use of the technology. These
initiatives are great because they give equal access to technology to all kids,
not only those whose parents can afford it. However, if the teacher is unaware
of how to use it, it will negate the purpose of the initiative in the first
place. We all know the pitfalls of implementing new programs or technologies
without first receiving proper introduction and professional development around
it. Technology has some great applications within the school setting, but by no
means is it the only method that should be used.
You are so right about the lack of social interactions for students in the video game model. I was shocked to see how much time kids spend playing video games! Students are so drawn into social media, they don't know how to have those face to face interactions. It sort of makes you wonder how the working world will change when this generation enters it. Will we slowly continue to lose our ability as a society to communicate in person?
ReplyDeleteI'll be interested to watch what happens in the coming years too, as this generation of children enters the workforce. I think as teachers, and future administrators, we can help ensure that interpersonal communication does not go by the wayside, by teaching collaboration through the use of technology.
DeleteEducating the whole-child is very important and has been a basis in education for a very long time. I agree that we cannot pigeon hole ourselves to one type of teaching is not effective.
ReplyDeleteI agree that face-to-face communication is evolving into a text, but I also see that collaboration can become easier ie. face time, google docs. Do educators have a job to help teach different forms of collaboration? If so, how can we keep up with changes in technology and apps?
Very well stated post that caused me to question some ideas I have had. Thanks
Thank you, Jim! I think it is crucial for educators to teach different forms of collaboration to their students. I also think there can be a technological component to that - responsible collaboration on social media, for example. Technology changes so rapidly now, I'm not sure how we keep up either! Interesting to think about...
DeleteI really agree with your thoughts on preparing all teachers for interacting with new technology and I posted something similar as well. What do you think about leading through empowering teacher leaders to be in charge of small PLC groups centered around exploring new technology? Should these groups be grouped by content area or mixed groups.
ReplyDeleteI think that would be a great idea! As a teacher who is currently on the path to leadership, I would love to take on that kind of responsibility at my school and I'm sure there are many teachers who would seize an opportunity like that. I teach at the elementary level, so groups could be grouped a few different ways. Since we already do grade level work in PLCs it might be nice to group in a different way. Thanks, Ali!
Delete